My Thoughts on the mRNA “Vaccine”

Instead of involving myself in the COVID-19 conversation, I have decided to conduct my own independent research and formulate this thesis and am publishing it for the notice of others.

In this post, my intention is not to provoke fear or negativity, rather it’s simply to highlight the Science, the ethics and the politics that light the way that I’m going, while guiding the reader to questions they should ask and research on their own. This is not meant to be an opinion piece, but instead an article written to draw attention to discrepancies that I have personally observed, while attempting to clarify said discrepancies by asking certain questions around the activities of the entire “pandemic”.

First of all, what is a Pandemic? According to Merriam Webster in 2018, the definition of pandemic was:

”: occurring over a wide geographic area and affecting an exceptionally high proportion of the population pandemic malaria The 1918 flu was pandemic and claimed millions of lives.”

In checking, and according to the United States Archives, “The virus infected roughly 500 million people—one-third of the world’s population—and caused  50 million deaths worldwide (double the number of deaths in World War I)”.

Questions:
How many deaths have been caused by COVID-19 as of 1 April 2021?
How should COVID-19 deaths be classified? How are COVID-19 deaths actually classified?
How many times has the definition for the word Pandemic been updated?

 

The Redefining Moments

What is a vaccine?

As late as November 2020, Merriam Webster defined Vaccine as:

“a preparation of killed microorganisms, living attenuated organisms, or living fully virulent organisms that is administered to produce or artificially increase immunity to a particular disease.”

 

As of January 2021, Merriam Webster now defines Vaccine as:

“a preparation that is administered (as by injection) to stimulate the body’s immune response against a specific infectious disease:

a: an antigenic preparation of a typically inactivated or attenuated pathogenic agent (such as a bacterium or virus) or one of its components or products (such as a protein or toxin)

b: a preparation of genetic material (such as a strand of synthesized messenger RNA) that is used by the cells of the body to produce an antigenic substance (such as a fragment of virus spike protein)”

Questions:
Why was the definition for the word Vaccine different in 2019?
What is the difference between DNA, RNA and mRNA vaccines?
Why did an RNA become classified as a Vaccine?

 

The Science

I invite you to look at the genetic altering ingredients of the concoctions that make up type b. (mRNA) by Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson, as they do not carry antibodies, but instead contain mRNA (gene synthesisers — meaning human being genes are being altered, now and for future generations), and are therefore not common vaccines as outlined in Webster’s 2021 definition of Vaccine above. According to Webster’s new definition of Vaccine, the mRNA classifies itself as one that modifies genes.

Given what we know about these concoctions, would it be particularly wise to modify the genes of an entire planetary population, especially given the clear lack of safety data?

According to the CDC website, the mRNA vaccine is authorized for use in the United States, however, it is not an FDA approved “vaccine” to prevent COVID-19. Make of that what you will.

 

Pfizer, Moderna & Johnson & Johnson Fact Sheets:

Pfizer Fact Sheet

Source: https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download

 

Moderna Fact Sheet

Source: https://www.fda.gov/media/144638/download

 

Johnson & Johnson

Source: https://www.fda.gov/media/146305/download

 

The Awkward Questions

Aside from the scientific rationale, there is an significant number of awkward (but moral) questions to be answered. Let’s address the elephants in the room:

9 questions to ask before accepting the “vaccine”.

1. Do Bill and Melinda Gates actually hold any official scientific or medical credentials?
2. Considering Bill and Melinda Gates are one of the more significant donors to the WHO, yet they seemingly control the WHO’s operations into how it should handle the pandemic. Do Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation have a direct conflict of interest in the global distribution of the vaccines?
3. Who was responsible for a mass sterilisation of countless women in Africa, without their informed consent?
4. What was the profession of Bill Gate, Sr. (father of Bill Gates)? How is this relevant?
5. Bill Gates has denied affiliations, but yet has been proven to have affiliations with convicted sex offender and human trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Why would Bill Gates attempt to deceive the public of his relation to Mr. Epstein? Research Shaun Attwood.
6. Which pharmaceutical companies have paid out billions of dollars in fines and compensations, for their guilty plea in a criminal fraud settlement?
7. Can you sue Pfizer Johnson & Johnson, or Moderna if you have severe COVID vaccine side effects?
8. Given that there is no FDA-approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19, can these current “vaccines” be deemed experimental, especially considering there is no longterm safety data?
9. What are the Nuremberg Trials?

The History

The Nuremberg Trials and the Nuremberg Code

After The Nuremberg Trials following WWII, the judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in a new code that is now accepted worldwide called the Nuremberg Code.

Held for the purpose of bringing Nazi war criminals to justice, the Nuremberg trials were a series of 13 trials carried out in Nuremberg, Germany, between 1945 and 1949. The defendants, who included Nazi Party officials and high-ranking military officers along with German industrialists, lawyers and doctors, were indicted on such charges as crimes against peace and crimes against humanity.

Given that the proposed mRNA vaccines, according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), has not approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19, can it be argued that the proposed treatment can be deemed experimental for the treatment and prevention of COVID-19? If such, would this then in face be in direct violation of the Nuremberg Code in multiple areas, not least of which include Section 3, and Section 6?

Section 3: “The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.”

Has there been any such activity?

Section 6: “The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.”

One must ask if the labelling of the COVID-19 crisis being a Pandemic is valid given that the World Health Organisation is strongly funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation who, as explained above, hold a significant financial conflict of interest into the crisis at hand, and if not, how does this apply to Section 6?

Public Servants who have sworn an oath to their office to uphold Constitutions and public safety should take note on their very possible infringement of the Nuremberg Code.

Those who are being coerced by public servants with threats against their livelihoods, professional positions, right to travel, or assemble should be aware of Section 1 of the Nuremberg Code: “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.”

 

What I’m Doing

My health is my number one asset, and I choose to optimise my own defence system through nutrition and exercise. I will not be outsourcing my health to self-confessed criminal enterprises or their affiliates.

I work independently and therefore do not consent to be beholden to any entity who’s contracts include clauses out of alignment with my personal health, ethical or political values.

Travel-wise, in the event travel restrictions are attempted, I know that my right to travel, and all of my human rights are bestowed to me by my Supreme Creator, not the State. Nobody can ever take away these rights, unless agreed to it by contract or by trust.

I invite well-resourced conscious entrepreneurs to start forming a private Freedom Airways, or similar as riding/flying privately and not by public methods of transportation will only become more and more popular.

Based on the data points as outlined above, not only is the concept of an untested rRNA vaccine is irresponsible of current figureheads to promote as it holds a global unknown risk to future generations given that it modifies gene sequences, the act of administering such an activity can be argued to be genocide.

I wish you all of the best on your own research and health journey. Remember, you of course are your own authority (unless you have signed that away by contract or by Trust, which is another topic we’ll cover), and should do what you feel is best for you.

3 Call To Actions

1. Take a stand by voting with your pocket book. The world we live in is one of a capitalistic nature. This means that the power of change comes from within, and then action is taken via our pocket books.
2. Stop unknowingly delegating your rights (Study Common Law and Contract Law).
3. Conscious Entrepreneurs: I invite you to join forces and collaborate with us at Creatiq where we are empowering missions that counter the negative effects we see happening on our planet today. Whether you’re a creator, writer, marketer, etc, reach out to us via our contact page and let us know what you’re working on.

 

Next up: Let’s talk about the Chinese Communist Party’s Social Credit System which the self-appointed authorities are attempting to roll out under the guise of a “vaccine passport”. Technology experts are warning: it only takes 30 minutes of programming of the “vaccine passports” to enable extreme social restrictions of any sort (consider denied entry to grocery stores, gyms, or public transportation).